Monday, April 18, 2011
Monday, 15 of November of 2010, 03:10:13 a.m.
Is it wrong that I mispell, confuse, derive, but, especially, alternate languages with no concern?
My mind starts shifting from one language to the other (they're only two).
I don't seem to have found a space. I might be talking about a physical place but, it is, above all, a place for my mind to be at ease. It's not. It has been a hard time dealing with shit that goes around inside, and it also has been having a real tough time dealing with shit that goes around in the world. The whole world. The fact that I can actually be writing this, is prodigious. Because as we speak (it's an expression) I've been considering going to therapy, go to sleep, end my relationships, and recognize myself as a lame stereotype. All that went through since I started typing. I can let go of my own spells.
This last theme (the one about me being a stereotype) arises some curiosity. I am a failed writer, and in general I am a failed artist. I also didn't succeed in academia, yet for the past five years or so, I keep believeing to portray some faculties nobody else in the world does. What is delusion of grandeur? I wast just watching this guy, who is barely breaking even about himself, and all of the sudden, while waiting in the street, starts doing some push ups. And I am very like that, if I think about it. I always have this intermitent sense of self-enhancement, that reaches a mediocre point, only to forget about it and move on with his nothingness. I am in a lot of things. Yet I could have not stand from bed in the last four days, and nobody would have noticed. I call myself busy, yet people working and earning academic merits at school and doing some charity work and spelunking and travelling, seem to have it all worked out. Senselessly, I return to the idea, that I might have something that explains my social backslash and makes up for my lack of achievement.
Just like when I was a kid, I didn't have much money, but I said, only to myself, that the reason for it was that I had a hoover-like slide, ressembling very much the one from the Back to the Future, when it's the future and that slide cannot work over water. I think it's funny because I don't consider that movie all that relevant in my life growing up. I used to wonder about being able to say that I had that slide, which was overwhelmingly expensive and could not be taken out in public easily. But I had it, and it was the reason why I didn't have new fancy clothes regularly, my family could not afford a car, I was not able to show off how much money I had. Just like most the guys I went to school with did.
They say writing it is therapeutic, yet my mind cannot let go easily, and simply absorbes every action directed to her either directly or indirectly. I am lazy, unplanned, undisciplined, and my mind does a very big effort trying to keep things that way. I am depressive, nasty, very capable of doing nothing just as much as relentlessly blaming me for it. I could go on. I live a stuck life. It has had its diversions, but it must be clear that it has been like that for some time now.
I had a dream last night where some old friends and I returned to some space we frequently gathered in, and as we were leaving all of them started crying about how much they missed it. Can you believe how condescending my dreams are now over me? Sure I have ideas that look nice for some people. But making them possible and appealing for them and much larger audiences is a real difficulty I don't seem able to overcome. It's actually very little what I think I'm capable of right now. But it's more that what I tell myself, or what my mind tells me: she's got me over her spell, and she won't just try to work myself best.
I'm not sure what follows. If my lack of general interest in regard of most issues, and my preset attitude of quitting, were triggered by difficulties and laziness experimented in the reality; or if it's actually the case that the impossibility of accomplishment is due simply to the fact that nothing is really worth trying. I honestly can't tell. It's getting late, and my mind, while awake, is not concerned with finding the right answer, not even a good answer. I am getting really tired once again and she is just laying down, allowing my judgement to flow from one pole to the other, carelessly, avoiding by all means some required energy or peace in order to clearify some things. I feel like I don't know myself. I'm pretty sure I used to.
Is it the loneliness? This is the longest relationship I've been with, yet I'm pretty sure this is the loneliest I've ever felt. I like to test it, following strange things and coming up with very dark references, then try and see what happens. I sure do have a memory. But it's not what I'm looking for. Some say it's nice in long standing couples for that to keep happening. I'm aware I haven't been very present, worried about this and that, nothing really significant. Yet from my point of view, they fail. I know the part about having a score is kind of ill-conceived. Maybe that is the point. Lately, I merely try to screw up, either by intention or by omission, just to see what happens. Just to see if that will make us break. Hasn't happened. Of course I am not going to take action on it, especially because if I think through, there is not really that much more or better for me due to a new statu quo. I know things with will get ugly more regularly, and that pain or sorrow or disgust will be increasing day by day. Whatcha gonna do. She has a way to simply ignore all that and induce herself to believe I amd some kind of fantastic guy, so, I know it's not only me who is doing quite dellusional.
And let's face it. What is we leave? What if it all ends? Could it possibly be that what I need is just more space for myself and nothing and nobody else? When this things happen and I am abducted from society for a while, it is a pain in the ass to return. Even buying some groceries, making questions in class or meeting with people I'm somewhat or very fond to, makes it all difficult and messy, and ultimately undesirable. Do I need more loneliness? Or, maybe in a regular direction to what I said above, I am simply taking workaround to confront loneliness in an apparent more dignified way, because it is impossible to me to talk and meet new people? When it comes to sex, for instance, I think letting her go or kill herself is the straigh path towards complete absence. Who would print love on me then? Going after somebody, it's just not my thing. I wish I was forty.
Sunday, March 27, 2011
One More Time. The Academic Dismisal. ¿Cuál es más riesgosa?
the teacher's theorethical framework.
Never ask thru a not common rule
of order.
Apologize for discussing philosphy of
science which does not aid to the
effective process of worker's training.
Count the time and add a regular
and correct joke. It always
must expose the self-centeredness you
swim into.
Don't try too hard. There is no point.
IA
when there's something that's not right
Must resolve and keep it up
Because we are not made for the illness
whatever happened beginning the last decade
of the century I was born in
when aggregated value stepped down
due to sticky salaries without reciprocity
Having warranties is having privileges in a society such as ours.
Whatever happened we must be soft.
It was a hystorical lesson, thought;
Benefits were split by assumption of oligopoly.
Monday, February 22, 2010
The Virgin Suicide.
Thursday, December 31, 2009
Lectures (new) 2009.10.06
It is not easy to explain or admit how I am wishing. Permanently. I am supposed to be a man of science. I could resort to reasons of the psychological order for the efficiency of my mind. That would be absolutely unsatisfactory. If that was the case, I would have to inquire about the shape the meanings take, because it would be a special one. Wishful thinking. If I wander about it, life is more of a growing concept than anything else. An idealistic proposition over a small square of complex, plenty life, that sits and rules even having no grounds or strong justifications. That’s an easy thing to see now that I know how shallow I am. Surfaces become inherent to me.
Written language is a two-dimensional mean. Sound speaking has a dimension of intensity and a dimension of time. As long as the educated brain remains unable to comprehend in any larger scope of information, such characteristic language is the only thing required to establish a humanly understandable transit and a humanly understandable creation of knowledge. My point is that language is, by mere evidence, superficial. Civilization, being an act of the mind, relies only on the superficial scope. By living here, I am also a four-dimensional being employing a two-dimensional intelligence. How could world be understood this way? How could I make myself clear? In fact I have to admit I am not trying to be easily readable. I shall move on.
As a child, I had no problem guessing the number of dimensions in this reality is unlimited. Facts can be modeled by simulations, but can the be understood? It’s a contradictory grievance: I am using the simulation argument to justify my hypothesis, of only what is important is interesting and only what is interesting is important. Even worse: It becomes such a strong hypothesis, because I wish so.
I have no foundations to believe that in every case, what is wanted finally happens. And I mean beyond human ignorance of what is utterly wanted. I also have no foundations to believe that laws of nature as harmonic or trustworthy, instead of arbitrarily ever-changing. That, for instance, is a pervasive wishful thinking from scientists. Simplicity, and beauty: Those were the commandments of modern physics. I think the only thing I have left is to resist.
A political battle ends up approaching when you try to warn instructors and colleagues about superficiality or, put in different words, shallowness.
Lectures. 2009.10.05
I am a microeconomic equation. A consumer problem for optimized differential calculus. Yet I didn't seem to be a reason of effort from my professor.
– I don't think I truly consider my goal to be reachable. Let's digress for a second over perfection. Nobody knows what it is yet there is a number of things that can be acknowledged as such. The critic point here lies in the fact of the stability of the definition. See how a two-dimensional dynamic simulation arises experience over a third dimension in the phenomenon; equivalently, a varying closeness perception applied to my quest gives a tell about an additional feature of thought.
– Very impressive. I think it's a clever move to forget classic theory and to attempt one of your own. Besides, any large effort to sustain your methodological framework is justified by the pleasure experienced by the gigantic size of your ego. And the awareness of the scope is what places somewhere in your space the rest, what is not relevant, what is not throughly felt. Usually, appearances are enough in this reality to resolve an issue. I'd dare to say appearance is the Queen and Master of the universe. I'm not quite sure it means such a powerful figure for yourself and yet it is the one reason you follow your quest: it's an aesthetic one.
– Looks by no mean can be sufficient into comprehension. That’s why answers are never lasting.
– You look enormous after yourself. That is why you are your own main problem. Is your use of language nothing but an apparatus of beauty to make everything else interesting? I just remembered your hypothesis: Only what is important is interesting, and vice versa.
The mention of the world beauty immediately led me to think about academy; and the reasons that keep me inside.
– I guess I have to build a world to base any further enlargement or enhancement.
– Yet you do not dare to act so. You are merely adopting existing objects. That’s why you’ll never set yourself free. That’s all you do, and that’s all you are: a living things recycler. Do not say you also get to relate with ugly. You embellish ugly to make it accountable.
– Power of the ugly is actually my own power inflicted into myself. Masochism.
I truly was not enjoying the way truth was adding up. The findings would make my work irrelevant to a major extent. Why that happens so often only to me is a wicked thing; my professor wondered maybe I’m being the only one who really understands the scientific method. It sounds naïve, pretentious and blatantly wrong. I have a problem with that.
Monday, November 30, 2009
Thursday, October 1, 2009
Lectures 2009.10.01
Monday, September 28, 2009
Lectures 1 2009.09.28
Sunday, September 27, 2009
Lectures Sunday 2009-09-27
Lately I've been bound to believe life it's nothing but an experiment from higher grounds. In the economical field, I have decided to opt for non controlled experiments, which is a rare, still uncommon method to follow in social sciences and much more in science in general. The idea of a trial where any factor in sight can potentially be the sole determinant of an outcome is resisted by scholars even with their enriching souls. But I think it’s a misleading one. Actually I would dare to say it really does not matter. Thinking quite beyond the preconceptions of how science is made one could reach propositions such as that, given the complexity of reality, the joint forces in development inhibit the flow of minor, irrelevant factors. Some critics would see it as the renounce from individual’s isolation given its tremendous technical efforts, which is visible in psychology and biology, among others. It’s not difficult to reply because it’s foreseeable how phenomena look so different as itself in absence of the rest of the world. Besides, forces and variables are never coming alone so, why bother?
One could defend the idea of caeteris paribus to be a sorry excuse for the lack of mental skills: why to build such an empty argument instead of standing still and pay only a little more of attention? Brain has been proven to easily recall differences in a landscape from color, mainly, and secondarily from shape. Why hasn’t it been trained to identify currents of effects among social, economic processes? As far as I’m concerned, the complex of issues that gives rise to my humanity can’t be obliterated while I study and develop the research my professor requests. It’s the purity infectious, as paradoxical as it may sound. But as I meant above, the clue is to make the most out of the act of brain, in order to reveal hidden behavior. Worries do not affect science, whether it is because complexity has lifted a barrier for them; or because my inner existential worries, at a point of latent influence, hold an organic relationship with the subject of my investigation.
If such a thing is true, I would be even more prone to consider myself and my flux of hormone response as a part of a latter, wider experimental practice. My eye ends up the lens of a telescope that works my own behavior. To be watched means nothing. Everything is recorded, and the one recording is helplessly attached to the problems of mine he, the foreigner, beholds.
Words start falling resembling the ideas in my brain and the hues in the rest of my body. The grieves of living in a circuit of cause and effect are clear, yet unseen. Is it maybe that experimental isolation is really what is necessary to avoid pain and sorrow? Childhood spoiling looks then like the guilty case of boring, one-sided, dismissive research results. But it can be over now. Although, that would point at childhood as an urgent matter. This is how it is supposed to work. It looks, in general appearance, brilliant.
So sad it is I would only see the professor until Wednesday, where I’ll forget about most of the hard core of my wonder. Memory appears like a big thing to come. Or is it, perhaps, information…
Friday, September 25, 2009
Lectures (2009-25-09)
It’s not like I have to be around him or any sort of emotional or supportive companion all of the time. It’s actually not a seldom event the one in which I am a genie among peers or associates. I guess right now I am referring to the point of solitude I manage to achieve between my several compromises. Today, I got to be. Yet I am forced to think, and to listen.
So I listened.
I could say I discovered how strongly I can be driven by inertia in the sense of running away from it. By listening I acknowledge once more how unsettled I am, and how much. I lust uncertainty, even to the point of danger. It’s probably from that where it derives my masochism, and maybe infrequent episodes of depression, accidents, helplessness, excess of happiness, and so on. My point is that, in the search of uncertainty juxtaposed with the search of stability by pretty much the rest of the world, I refuge in myself. The headache cuts the flow of self endorsement and I am forced to face the opportunism of the figure known as the other. Funny thing, because she shows up once my working memory starts to fail and I will deal with the issue of confronting a person.
It’s a hyperbolic scheme. A person in front of my eyes and it’s impossible to gain the minimal focus on myself. My only exit is to let me go into the eyes of the one in front of me. An inquiry thus becomes a quarrel for the part of my soul living in the guts of the interlocutor.
A glance, then, is an act of admiration. A kiss, is a demonstration of spiritual want. And, a sex, well, a sex is…
Lectures 1
Even thought I see him as my neurologist professor, I would not like to commence thinking of him as a pathological being of the likes of teachers and instructors. Not because he is too different from the others. This is just about a matter of approach.
I've seen him only a couple of times. I must clarify I'm an economics student and I did not choose medicine due to a thought of shortness of mind. Soon I realized how such small gap among disciplines and crowds of people belonging to those was no issue abroad. I'm still here, nevertheless.
Sadly it came a point where my so-called science became predictable and the part of my brain craving for ulterior challenges started to grieve. I noticed quickly how advances in neural science came from all sources. There was basement research coming from low income regions in East Asia that turned out to be just as relevant as the ones coming from the top universities in the Western. I really could not tell the ways and directions I'm driven into, what really drives me, but I could say there are subjects currently evolving and being considered as cutting edge: AI, TOM, Supertrings, post-dramatic theater, and Complexity Science. I follow the blanks, simply put.
I finished the Faust des Spiesz over a year and a half ago and life has not been the same ever since. Sure real events occurred since then but in general terms, «my molecular structure did not fall from stability», as my professor would say. The book from where I admit I only got sorrowful fractions is still nurturing my ideas and the world surrounding me. The professor, at my first psychiatry session in his practice, easily spotted a number of issues that stroke me badly. As if I was a huge pop or advertising frame after his eyes. What did I expect?
– Ideas are one true source of ecstasy for you. The bigger and the more invading they are, the better. I am right now, for instance, a big idea you can’t turn your eyes from.
There he was with his narcissistic speech I identify with so much. As resounding as always, as pleasurable to have his only company as the other sources of physical delight I have so successfully tasted. I especially enjoy his hands swinging along the rhythm of his explanation. I certainly did not want to look naïve or speechless at him. My equally overcoming ego would not let his casual words get such a critic tone on me. I would fight back, defeat him and feed with his shredded flesh. I would be content with that metaphorically this time.
– I can see clearly your existence depends on the idea of the integrated myth, as a rational quest. I also couldn’t help to notice how you mention your objective so human, so close to your own understanding. How can you tell from this point the distance you are from and the dimensions it would employ?
Wednesday, September 23, 2009
Lectures
Friday. Passion is just wishful thinking.
Something is keeping me from returning home. I have lots of pending readings but this day I simply do not function. I should be resting but instead the illumination of my incandescent thinking sets me down by a light pole in the cold, dark, young night. I keep myself visible. I fiercely want to be seen. I made lots of colorful pictures of myself. I believe to be hearing familiar sound, one voice in particular yet I see nobody and no one real approaches me.
As I begin to develop some of my remarkable procedures alone in the dark, I realize how physically ill I’ve been feeling for a while now. It’s strange because it is not relevant but at the same time I cannot tell how a mixture of physical and emotional phenomenon inflicts pain in a way beyond my control, which diminishes my will for it to end. For a moment, I stare. I wonder how a concert would sound.
I have not yet reached a verdict on holding of myself so my system faints. I am far, resembling the truths from my professor. Of the number of things I get to speak on, however, I am yet to identify where I tell the truth.
Touch me, I'm going to scream if you don't
Inside I have the feeling that you won't
I can tell by the way you smile, I'm smiling too
I can see myself in you
I can tell by the sounds you make, when you are pleased, you see yourself in me
How many nights can a soul so full of life remain untouched?
How could a soul make the most of what is whole and what is here?
I need a human right by my side, untied, untied
http://is.gd/41nh5
